Boston Marathon Bombings : Who is the brothers’ conspirator?

Some news outlets, including the Boston Globe, are mentioning a third accomplice  in the rampage that appears to have been present during the shootout with authorities and the ensuing confusion. The article in the ‘Boston Globe,’ entitled  “Marathon Bombing Suspects Threw ‘Crude Grenades’ at Officers” reads as follows,

“Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev was alive and struggling with Watertown police early Friday morning, when his younger brother and alleged coconspirator drove over him in a stolen SUV, dragging him on the pavement and apparently inflicting the fatal injuries that killed him, said Watertown Police Chief Ed Deveau in a Globe interview.”

Details still appear to be extremely muddled in terms of who all was involved and what exactly transpired on Friday night. Someone who commented on a NY Times article mentioned something about a half naked suspect that was apprehended that same night and that they saw it on TV as the events were unfolding. If there is a third suspect, which there appears to be , will we hear more about this person and if so , when ? Why has there not been more information about this suspect? We at the Heterodox Tribune do not openly embrace ridiculous conspiracy theories but clearly there is something worth mentioning about this. Either the news reports are falsely reporting the events or the brothers did not act alone on Friday night .

“BOY SETS FIRE” IS BACK!!

In an age that has seemed to forget how think historically, much less politically, bands such as Boy Sets Fire are much needed. And for anyone that has been a fan of their music since the late 90s it is a welcomed return. The official video for “Bled Dry” is reminiscent of “The Force Majeure” in that its lyrical vitriol. There is no war but the class war and this band is poised to continue to do what it has done for many: continue to inspire us to get angry and do something about it because after all, anger is a gift!

They are set to tour all over Europe and the U.S. in the coming months so be prepared because they are just as good live as they are any in other medium.

Dear LAPD, Prove Christopher Dorner’s Allegations are Unfounded!

Image

As everyone who has an internet connection knows by now, Christopher Dorner published an 11,000 word diatribe against the LAPD for blacklisting him from the department for speaking out against excessive force. In this manifesto he states,

    ”In 8/07 I reported an officer (Ofcr. Teresa Evans/now a Sergeant), for kicking a suspect (excessive force) during a Use of Force while I was assigned as a patrol officer at LAPD’s Harbor Division. While cuffing the suspect, (Christopher Gettler), Evans kicked the suspect twice in the chest and once in the face. The kick to the face left a visible injury on the left cheek below the eye. Unfortunately after reporting it to supervisors and investigated by PSB (internal affairs investigator Det. Villanueva/Gallegos), nothing was done. I had broken their supposed “Blue Line”.

He then proceeds to detail how he appealed the Board of Rights where Gettler reaffirmed to the panel that he was kicked in the chest and face by officer Evans. According to Dorner, despite hearing this testimony the panel still found him guilty and terminated him. Dorner explains how the panel was made up of people that had an acute conflict of interest because as he puts it, 

     “Capt. Phil Tingirides was a personal friend of Teresa Evans from when he was her supervisor at Harbor station. That is a clear conflict of interest and I made my argument for his removal early and was denied. The advocate for the LAPD BOR was Sgt. Anderson. Anderson also had a conflict of interest as she was Evans friend and former partner from Harbor division where they both worked patrol together. I made my argument for her removal when I discovered her relation to Evans and it was denied.”

If Dorner’s accusations are indeed true; that he was blacklisted and terminated for trying to do the right thing then one could assume that he was unjustly retaliated against. There are many aspects and topics that he touches on in his diatribe against the LAPD, but the opening explanation about how he was unjustly terminated from the force is striking. After all, is it that difficult to presume that he is correct? Or is he a man that went crazy just for crazy’s sake? It goes without saying that whistle-blowers are met with criticism and consternation from their respective institutions for exposing unsound practices and corruption. Is it really that hard to imagine that the LAPD would respond in such a way?

The LAPD has a long and dark history of corruption and racism poured into its foundation and Los Angeles is no stranger to race riots and civil unrest against the LAPD for it’s lack of consideration for basic civil rights, especially for minorities. In fact, Dorner references officers implicated in the Rodney King beating as having continued and successful careers in the department to this day.

It is sad that this man, if guilty of the crimes he is accused of, descended into such violent outbursts of rage and bloodshed. But if the claims he has made turn out to be true in any way, shape or form, then one could conjecture that the LAPD has a lot of blood on its hands, not just because they have a hand in creating this situation, but for the decades of racism, cronyism, corruption and injustice that has permeated the police force and has been allowed to continue unabated because officers that denounce such practices are quickly and efficiently discredited and hung out to dry like dirty laundry. 

Therefore, I call on the LAPD to discredit Mr. Dorner and prove that he is a madman that went “postal” and “crazy” for no apparent reason. Prove to me that his violence and hatred for the LAPD came about in a historical and cultural vacuum. Whether it is racism or corruption in the police force or fabricated evidence in order to invade another country, the denial of culpability on the part of institutionalized power is alienating, narcissistic and and terrifying. “Crazy” men that snap are only as crazy as the social relations and cultural alienation that begets them. 

Capitalism Can’t Grow Forever!

One of the inherit features of any healthy capitalist economy is growth. The gross domestic product (GDP) has to consistently be expanding in order for the economy to create jobs. If there is an economic downturn and productivity becomes stagnant or slows down then workers get laid off, businesses close and no one is happy. Businesses must remain profitable and reinvest some of their realized profits in expansion in order to grow and remain competitive in the world of aggressive, cannibalistic competitors. Most economists agree that the compound rate of growth required for a healthy economy is around 3% per annum. “Growth! Growth! Growth!”That’s what is barked at us every time we hear Mitt Romney or President Obama speak about the economy.

Theoretically and historically it makes sense. Ever since merchants and traders began to sow the seeds of free trade that would help usher in the fall of feudal overlords, oppressive monarchies and slavery in the New World, there was what seemed like infinite growth for capitalism to expand and for trade to flourish. Over the last several hundred years the spread of capitalism helped fuel colonization, imperialism and wars for cherished resources. Not to delve too deep into the historical evolution and growth of capitalism, let us simply say that when capitalism was confined to several small regions, such as Western Europe, it was easy and justifiable to view economic growth as something infinite. When capitalism was confined to the textile factories of Manchester, or the shipyards and port of Liverpool, one did not think or pay any mind to the limits to capitalism’s potential for growth.

Fast-forward to 2012. Capitalism is everywhere. Virtually every country on Earth has an economy that is either capitalist in some way or is operating in a global economy that is dominated by it. It becomes plain to see that the growth that was so easy to attain during the last few centuries, or even since the end of WWII up until the 1970s, has become increasingly more difficult to maintain. It is ludicrous for proponents of capitalism to continue to think that a compound rate of growth for the economy can continue on a planet with finite resources. The “ecological footprint” test has shown that if every person on Earth consumed as much as the average person in the U.S., then we would need at least five more Earths in order to accommodate the levels of consumption. Everyone knows that that is an impossible task to realize but the dogmas and belief in capitalism  has billions in the developing world chasing the illustrious model of North American prosperity. And who can blame them? The U.S. was able to achieve its wealth and status with complete disregard for the natural world or the limited amounts of finite resources that exist on this planet so why should China or India act differently? There are only so many trees, cobalt mines and oil reserves to exploit and the leaders in the U.S. are more than proud that they snatched them up first. As stated above, for a system that depends on exponential growth, about 3% per annum, in order to survive, it is a lofty pipe dream to think that we can continue to use the same metrics for economic growth without completely depleting the Earth of all its resources while drastically sharpening the geographical conflicts that will arise as resources become more scarce.

The metrics used to determine the health of an economy must soon transcend the current model of infinite growth with limited resources. A system or a business that becomes more profitable the more that it consumes must be inverted somehow. Harmony with nature and a system that is serious about sustainability must be advocated for. What we currently have cannot last much longer given the rates of resource depletion, climate damage, and human suffering.

The Walking Dead #100

SPOILERS AHEAD!

There was a great deal of hype built up leading to the release of The Walking Dead #100 and as it turns out it was well deserved. Those that have followed the comic from the beginning know that it has had plenty of drama and flesh devouring violence to satisfy the most macabre horror hounds. And it is this human drama that has time and time again made the hyper-violence and gore all the more significant, and therefore not gratuitous to any extent.

Negan and Company

Rick and his inner core of followers are tough as hell and have survived the most desperate and destitute of situations. From The Governor’s sadism on Michonne and Rick, to the crazed cannibals in “Fear the Hunters,” Rick and the others have proven that they are not to be fucked with– until now that is. Enter Negan, he is shaping up to be one of the most villainous and powerful survivors that Rick and his cadre have hitherto encountered. Just when you think the Governor’s magnitude cannot be matched we have one of the most cherished characters getting his face turned into ground zombie slough.

It was unclear to many what issue 100 was going to entail. Many were most definitely expecting more of a panoramic of bloodshed, but instead we were thrust into an intimate and brutal execution of one of our favorite personalities, Glenn. In a post-apocalyptic world Glenn has often been the source of humor and affection, as well as a new found father to be, it makes his death all the more powerful and heart-wrenching. When he is savagely beaten to death by Lucille, the barbwire wrapped baseball bat, Negan does it in such a way that one can only cringe at the normality with which Negan kills him. It was quite honestly hard to read, especially when he is uttering Maggie’s name right before Lucille and Negan kiss him in the jaw.

One can only anxiously anticipate what is going to happen next, and that is what comics are all about. Will Rick and the others be enslaved by Negan? Everyone knows that will not end well for Rick because he is the undisputed alpha-dog. How about Michonne? Who is she going to wreak vengeance on? Will the hilltop acquiesce or revolt? And what about that asshole with the half burnt face? I am sure we have not seen the last of him. Now that Kirkman and Adlard have everyone even emotionally invested with issue 100, the assault on Andrea and the others might prove to be even more sinister. These are the questions that make this the best selling indie comic in a long time. At a solid 380k sellout of the first printing the future is bright for The Walking Dead and other creator driven projects.

Kony 2012: Or, the White Man’s Continued Burden and Willful Ignorance

The “Kony 2012″ video is viral. It has received around 70 million views on youtube. From the beginning of the video until its awe inspiring, empowering end, one cannot help but feel moved by some of the imagery and repulsed by much of its content and what it symbolizes.

The campaign by “Invisible Children” has a dialectical effect that champions a noble cause on the one hand whilst perpetuating all that is wrong with the West’s idea of international law and who and what should be subjected to it. These two ideas of the heartfelt and repulsive are synthesized well enough for anyone that has the courage to view what is happening in Uganda from a perspective that is, dare I say, African? Or by someone that believes that Africans are not helpless children that depend on US paternalism in order to bring someone to justice. I am certain there are many Ugandans that are both in favor of the US intervening as well as opposed to it. The problem is that the “Kony 2012″ doesn’t seem to take their views very seriously, or at all. And that’s a problem that has been around ever since before the Berlin Conference of 1884 and the “Scramble for Africa.”

One cannot watch this video and wonder where the African perspective is. Do they all see themselves as so defenseless and reliant on the Great White Savior to come to their rescue? Do they all want the US to militarily intervene in their country? Does the average Ugandan feel as though the conflict in Uganda is that flat and simplistic?

One also can’t help but wonder why the court is not named the African Criminal Court and not the International Criminal Court. No one disagrees that Joseph Kony is  vile and wretched man that should be arrested and brought to justice for his crimes, that is indisputable. However, how can it be that someone like Kony could be the focus of so much international attention for war crimes while other war criminals, such as George Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld, to name a few, continue to walk freely?

The International Criminal Court has hitherto pursued cases almost exclusively in AFRICA of men that are AFRICAN. It is true that poorer states with fewer resources tend to defer to the ICC for various reasons. But that does not explain the disproportionality  between those indicted in Africa versus those indicted here in the West. After all, it is here in the US that the war crimes in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos,  Nicaragua, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc, have been engineered and carried out, yet not one person has faced charges for their “crimes against humanity.”

It does not matter if  crimes against humanity are carried out with depleted uranium, napalm, agent orange,a machetes, an AK-47, or a laser guided missile. Nor does the geography of where such a crime matter. A crime carried out by a US warplane in Baghdad against innocent men, women, and children is no different than a member of Joseph Kony’s army indiscriminately raping and murdering a young girl or forcing a boy to kill his parents. It just makes us in the West feel better if we condemn these African monsters while ignoring the monsters on our own soil.

Noam Chomsky once observed that if the standards employed during the Nuremberg Trials against the Nazis afther WWII were employed today every US President since WWII would have been hung for war crimes. Perhaps that helps to explain the need and desire for the West to continue to validate its legitimacy by continuing to accuse “the Other” while maintaining the myth of dignity and policy of humanitarian imperialism abroad. While the “Kony 2012″ video should be recognized as a very well intentioned and effective campaign to make Kony “famous,” it should also be recognized for what it does not address and the broader significance that such willful ignorance perpetuates.

Link to ICC’s most wanted list:

http://usaforicc.org/mostwanted/flash

Occupy Wall Street and the Imperative to Question Capitalism

The “Occupy Wall Street” movement is gaining traction and support throughout the broader segments of civil society each day. And with each day that passes its legitimacy grows as exponentially as the fear of the 1% that is responsible for creating the global crisis of capitalism. The movement is only a few weeks old and already the illegitimate forces of the powers that be are acting irresponsibly by pepper spraying peaceful protesters, willfully misguiding marchers one minute only to “kettle” them and arrest hundreds of them the next. Do the authorities not understand that actions such as these only help to garner more support for the movement? Most of the mainstream media tries to marginalize the activists by characterizing them as unorganized and frivolous, or as hippies and anarchists. The past 40 years of disenfranchisement of the working class and concentration of monopoly capitalism on a global scale is beginning to be directly challenged by the nexus of global activists from the streets of New York City to the picket lines of Athens, and it’s making some people in power nervous…

At the heart of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement and the general resistance to capitalist structural adjustment and austerity measures globally is the desire among activists to bring into question many aspects of not just corporate greed, fraudulently foreclosed homes, inequality, imperialism, political corruption, and unemployment, but a genuine desire to create more serious discourse about the very social and economic system that, up until now, so many people have taken for granted and accepted as something as natural as the air we breathe.

In 2011 many people are beginning to see for themselves that capitalism is indeed not as natural and eternal as the champions of the status quo like to make them think. And as their pensions dwindle, their debts accumulate, their jobs vaporize, and their wages are further repressed in order to restore profits for big business and “liquidity” in the global markets, they are beginning to see that capitalism is not as beneficial for them or for society as a whole, especially when recklessness is rewarded and avarice is celebrated. People are also beginning to understand more that the traditional political parties, both Democrats and Republicans alike, provide no real alternatives to the problems that the majority of working people are faced with. In fact, the feeble solutions offered do nothing that will qualitatively alter the conditions that created the crisis in the first place. Just to quickly illustrate how perverse the situation is, it should be known that not one architect of the global meltdown has been charged or jailed for any of their criminal behavior in defrauding homeowners, destroying retirements, waging war and then making billions of of it, etc., but somehow 700 peaceful protesters were arrested for walking on a bridge!

The anti-Wall Street atmosphere is brimming with inquisitive and passionate people that are asking many questions about the fundamental operation of the capitalist mode of production as a whole. A lot of young people are beginning to question if the system we have is indeed sustainable or even worth keeping around much longer. For example, we are told incessantly by cheerleaders of the capitalist system that in order to bring the US, and naturally, Western Europe, out of recession and for profits to be restored to business that the economy must expand at 3% per annum. This means that GDP has to be on the continual rise day after day, year after year,which also means that in order for that to happen more markets have to be exploited, more resources have to be extracted, and America’s twisted consumer culture has to keep growing. This seems paradoxical for a society that is vowing to implement meaningful reforms or to be more “sustainable.” Can you see the ridiculousness of it all? Capitalism cannot expand at a compound rate forever! There is only one Earth and that one Earth only has so many resources to exploit and extract.

Another issue that many activists are beginning to discuss deals with the fact that in order for society to truly be a democracy and for resources to be distributed more equitably there has to first and foremost be democracy in the work place. We hear political figures speak about having a free and open democratic society all the time, but how democratic can any society be when most people that work 40-50 hrs a week enter into definite relations of production in the workplace that are anything but democratic! The workplace is the perfect example of a tyranny. The boss is the tyrant while the worker is forced to accept any and every decision that is made from the top tier down. How is that democracy? Democracy in society can only express itself as a democratic principle when it correlates to democracy in the places of employment. If the 99% of people that are represented as those that are not corporate CEOs, bankers, and entrenched politicians had more say in the decisions and the distribution of the surplus that is created in the workplace then we would begin to see a more equitable society and social order emerge. Democracy in its evolved form will manifest itself in a workplace that is run by those that actually work there!

These are just a few of the many questions that the 99% should be addressing about capitalism in its current, extremely unequal and exploitative form. The crisis evolved not out of thin air, but out of specific historical conditions that have hitherto coalesced into a crisis of epidemic proportions, and it is our responsibility to ask questions and search for answers that are truly historic. Capitalism is only the “end of history” for those that feel there is no more history to create; no more justice to be brought about, and no progression and dignity for the human condition to fulfill.

Hasta la victoria!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.